At 2:08 p.m., Oil Fell Below Zero. Then Sellers Started Paying.

On Monday, April 20, 2020, oil was still worth $17.73 when trading opened in New York. The price already looked miserable. In ordinary times, it would have counted as a historic collapse.

But the line kept falling. Ten dollars. Five. One.

Shortly after 2 p.m., it crossed zero. On the screens, a barrel of West Texas Intermediate for delivery in May was now trading at a negative price.

At −$10, the seller gave away the oil and added ten dollars. At −$20, twenty. Around 2:30 p.m., the contract touched −$40.32 before officially settling at −$37.63 a barrel.

This was not a misplaced decimal point or a frozen display. The trades happened. Buyers really were paid to accept the commodity that fuels cars, aircraft, factories and much of the modern world.

To understand why, you have to leave Wall Street and look for an empty tank in Oklahoma.

No One Receives a Little Barrel by Clicking “Buy”

The price collapsing that day did not cover every barrel of oil in existence. It belonged to one specific futures contract: WTI crude for delivery in May 2020.

A standard contract represents 1,000 barrels, or roughly 159,000 litres. Refineries, producers, traders and investors use it to agree today on a price for future delivery. Most participants who have no intention of touching physical oil sell their position before the deadline.

They take the gain or loss and move on. According to the US Energy Information Administration, only about one per cent of contracts make it all the way to physical delivery.

But the May contract expired on Tuesday, April 21. By Monday, anyone still holding one was nearly out of time. If they could not find a buyer, they would have to accept the crude at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point specified by the market.

Owning oil was no longer an abstract line in an account. It meant access to a terminal, pipeline arrangements and, above all, somewhere to store 1,000 barrels per contract.

The commodity had suddenly become heavy, liquid and extraordinarily cumbersome again.

Cushing’s Tanks Were Not All Full. But the Empty Space Was Already Spoken For

In the spring of 2020, aircraft were grounded, roads emptied and factories slowed abruptly. Within weeks, the Covid-19 pandemic erased a vast share of global demand.

Production could not stop at the same pace. Shutting a well can be expensive, damage it or make restarting difficult. Oil kept arriving as refineries reduced their purchases.

The surplus flowed into storage. At Cushing, inventories rose from about 38 million barrels in early March to nearly 60 million on April 17. The EIA estimated that the facilities had reached 76 per cent of their working capacity.

In theory, room remained. But an empty tank is not necessarily an available tank. It may already be leased, reserved for a shipment on its way or needed to keep pipelines operating. Traders who had arranged nothing in advance discovered that vacant space in a statistic was not a booking in their name.

The problem on Monday, April 20 was not merely that too much oil existed. The last holders of the contract had to get rid of it by the next day, in a market with very few buyers still able to receive it.

A Negative Price Can Be the Cheapest Way Out

Imagine a trader holding ten contracts. That is 10,000 barrels to be received. The trader owns no tank at Cushing and has no agreement with a company able to take them.

Keep the contracts, and the trader may have to improvise an expensive logistical operation inside a saturated terminal. Sell them, and the problem disappears from the calendar immediately. Even at −$10, −$20 or −$30 a barrel, the loss is known and the delivery goes away.

On the other side, a company with a tank, pipeline capacity or storage agreement can accept payment. It receives the oil and the cash attached to it, then may wait for a later contract offering a positive price.

The oil remained useful. But in that precise place, for that precise delivery and during those few hours, the cost of receiving it exceeded its value.

A negative price did not mean petrol was about to become free at the pump. It measured the desperation of a group of sellers trapped just before expiry.

In the Final Hour, Buyers All but Disappeared

A Commodity Futures Trading Commission report shows that liquidity had already thinned before April 20. Many participants had left the contract, yet the number of open positions at the start of the session remained unusually high for a deadline so close.

Between 1 p.m. and the 2:30 p.m. settlement, the fall became exceptionally fast. Market safeguards triggered several temporary pauses, but too few buyers returned.

At the opening, a 1,000-barrel contract was still worth $17,730. At settlement, it was worth −$37,630. The swing exceeded $55,000 in a single session.

Some brokerage systems had not even been designed to display a negative price correctly. Clients thought they were buying for pennies an asset that could fall no further. The line crossed zero and kept going, turning what looked like a bargain into a brutal loss.

The market’s technical rules had long allowed for negative prices. Many of the people using it had never truly believed they would see one.

The Next Day, Oil Turned Positive Again Without the Tanks Emptying

The May contract expired on April 21. Once that immediate pressure passed, attention shifted to the June contract, which gave producers and buyers more time to make arrangements.

The market did not think the crisis was over. Inventories kept rising and demand remained depressed. But the extreme negative price did not spread in the same way to contracts further into the future.

What happened on April 20 was not proof that finance had entirely lost touch with reality. It was almost the opposite. For a few hours, reality imposed itself with perfect brutality: a financial asset meant to represent oil forced its holders to think about pipes, distances, dates and the exact volume of a storage tank.

Oil Had Not Lost All Its Value. Somewhere to Put It Was Worth a Fortune

The image of a barrel priced at −$37.63 is easy to remember. It feels absurd because it contradicts the simple idea that a useful resource must always cost something.

But a price never measures the object alone. It also measures the place, the moment, the urgency and the ability to refuse delivery.

That Monday, oil, buyers and even a few empty tanks still existed. What had disappeared was time.

Read next

Was a Tulip Really Worth a House? The Truth Is Stranger.
He Paid 10,000 Bitcoins for Two Pizzas. And No, It Wasn’t Foolish.
He Didn’t Print Counterfeit Notes. He Convinced the Real Printer to Do It.